Datenerreichbar
Anthropic Economic Index: AI's impact on software development
Bericht des Anthropic Economic Index vom 28.04.2025 über 500.000 Gespräche zum Programmieren, aufgeteilt zwischen Claude Code und Claude.ai. Er vergleicht, wie oft das Modell eine Aufgabe selbst erledigt, und schätzt vorläufig, welcher Anteil auf Startups entfällt.
geprüft 10.11.2026
Worauf sich diese Seite beruft, wörtlich, abgerufen am 12.10.2026:
All conversations used in our analysis across Claude.ai and Claude Code were from April 6-13, 2025.
bestätigt 10.11.202679% of conversations involved some form of automation, compared to 49% on Claude.ai.
bestätigt 10.11.2026the primarily web-focused development languages of Java
bestätigt 10.11.2026Script and Type Script together accounted for 31% of all queries where developers of varying levels of experience describe their desired outcomes in natural language and let AI take the wheel on implementation details.
bestätigt 10.11.2026Claude.ai conversations were specifically those from Claude.ai Free and Pro.
bestätigt 10.11.2026This sample only includes Claude Code sessions powered by the first-party API
bestätigt 10.11.2026We excluded Team, Enterprise, and API usage that might show different patterns, particularly in professional settings
bestätigt 10.11.2026which distills user conversations into higher-level, anonymized insights.
bestätigt 10.11.2026which Claude opted for in 5% of Claude.ai conversations and 2% of Claude Code conversations.
bestätigt 10.11.2026We excluded this category from analysis and renormalized the results
bestätigt 10.11.2026were also higher on Claude Code (43.8%, versus 27.5% on Claude.ai).
bestätigt 10.11.2026were nearly twice as common on Claude Code (35.8% of interactions) as Claude.ai (21.3%).
bestätigt 10.11.2026AI-assisted coding currently requires a lot of human reviewing and iteration relative to non-coding tasks, even when Claude does the bulk of the work.
bestätigt 10.11.2026The HTML numbers for Claude.ai are likely inflated slightly because Artifacts leverage HTML.
bestätigt 10.11.2026In a preliminary analysis, we estimated that 33% of conversations on Claude Code served startup-related work, compared to only 13% identified as enterprise-relevant applications.
bestätigt 10.11.2026Startup work accounted for 32.9% of Claude Code conversations
bestätigt 10.11.2026whereas enterprise work represented only 23.8% of Claude Code conversations
bestätigt 10.11.2026We therefore treat these findings as more preliminary than the ones described above.
bestätigt 10.11.2026our analysis tool made educated guesses based on incomplete information.
bestätigt 10.11.2026Claude.ai usage does not include Claude For Work (Team and Enterprise plans) usage, which implies that enterprise numbers for Claude.ai specifically are likely undercounted
bestätigt 10.11.2026We only studied what developers delegate to AI
bestätigt 10.11.2026Our dataset likely captures early adopters.
bestätigt 10.11.2026Two of the top five tasks were focused on user-facing app development
bestätigt 10.11.2026each accounted for 12% and 8% of conversations, respectively
bestätigt 10.11.2026Such tasks increasingly lend themselves to a phenomenon known as
bestätigt 10.11.2026to categorize a conversation as focusing on
bestätigt 10.11.2026our results do show that even within automation, humans are still very often involved
bestätigt 10.11.2026The boundary between automation and augmentation becomes increasingly blurred with agentic tools like Claude Code.
bestätigt 10.11.2026slightly below their 25.9% share on Claude.ai
bestätigt 10.11.2026Some classifications might therefore be incorrect.
bestätigt 10.11.2026the quality of the resulting code, or whether these interactions effectively improved productivity or code quality
bestätigt 10.11.2026this self-selection could skew usage patterns towards more experienced or technically adventurous users
bestätigt 10.11.2026