Anthropic, Code Review

Worauf sich diese Seite beruft, wörtlich, abgerufen am 17.10.2026:

• Findings arrive as inline comments on the lines concerned, ranked by severity, with a summary and a check run on the pull request.bestätigt 10.11.2026
• Plans: Team and Enterprisebestätigt 10.11.2026
• several agents examine the diff and the surrounding code in parallelbestätigt 10.11.2026
• A review runs on Anthropic infrastructure in four stagesbestätigt 10.11.2026
• Verify: a verification step checks the candidate findings against the code and filters out false positives.bestätigt 10.11.2026
• a review works from reading the diff and the surrounding code, without building or running your code.bestätigt 10.11.2026
• A review never approves or blocks the pull request, so the decision to merge stays with your team.bestätigt 10.11.2026
• Standard: balanced depth, speed, and cost. The default level.bestätigt 10.11.2026
• Deep: the most thorough pass. Takes the longest and costs the most.bestätigt 10.11.2026
• An Owner chooses one level for the organization and can give an individual repository its ownbestätigt 10.11.2026
• Code Review uses AI to review code and may miss bugs, security vulnerabilities, or other issues.bestätigt 10.11.2026
• A review with no findings doesn’t mean your code is error-free or secure.bestätigt 10.11.2026
• Code Review isn’t available to organizations with Zero Data Retention enabled or with the HIPAA configuration appliedbestätigt 10.11.2026
• Code Review isn’t yet available for organizations that use customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK).bestätigt 10.11.2026
• including GitHub Enterprise Server and GitHub Enterprise Cloud with data residencybestätigt 10.11.2026
• For data residency, have an Owner follow the GitHub Enterprise Server admin setupbestätigt 10.11.2026
• inside a review, access to your repository is read-only, and a review doesn’t push commitsbestätigt 10.11.2026
• that other Claude features sharebestätigt 10.11.2026